The debate raged throughout the night, and into the following afternoon, as members argued whether Norris’s resolution was privileged, and therefore at the top of the agenda, or whether the Speaker had to grant permission to even vote on the resolution. In particular, the Norris resolution sought to end the Speaker’s control over Congress’s legislative agenda by reducing his influence on the Rules Committee, which is responsible for sending most legislation to the floor for a vote. Patrick’s Day, while many of Cannon’s supporters in the House were out celebrating, Norris seized his opportunity to combine with Democrats to introduce a resolution reducing the Speaker’s powers. Senate, were frustrated that Cannon used his powers to keep Progressive legislation off of the House agenda. Progressive Republicans, such as George Norris, who would go on to a prominent career, including a lengthy stint in the U.S. In 1910, Speaker Joseph Cannon faced a revolt from within the ranks of his own Republican Party. Among their most significant (and controversial) powers, Speakers were able to exert considerable influence over the House Rules Committee, which is responsible for sending most legislation to the floor for vote. Speakers were so powerful that they were often referred to as “czars,” a reference to the autocratic rulers of Russia. During the first decade of the twentieth century, the Speaker of the House of Representatives possessed enormous power (see “Rules of the House of Representatives”, “Obstructions in the National House” and “A Deliberative Body”, and Constitutional Government in the United States).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |